Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:47:24 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: FreeBSD branches stats Message-ID: <200610200847.25039.josh@tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <ehafmo$u3u$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20061019194046.GA35135@xor.obsecurity.org> <200610200816.k9K8GcBu063508@lurza.secnetix.de> <ehafmo$u3u$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 20 October 2006 07:33, Ivan Voras wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > http://bsdstats.org/releases.php > > Hmm, these stats look garbled to me. There are even some > nonsensical data - versions 1.x and 9.x. > > My suggestion is to the creators of bsdstats to group version > numbers by OS type (FreeBSD/NetBSD/others) since the current > display seems unusable. > Personally I've never had a very high opinion of the whole bsdstats thing. And while the merits of the whole thing might be debatable I think it's pretty obvious that the implimentation of it is poor at best. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610200847.25039.josh>