Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:27:15 -0600 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC'ing xucred definition Message-ID: <20011206132715.X92148@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20011206065633.9E9953E4B@bazooka.trit.org>; from dima@trit.org on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:56:28AM %2B0000 References: <20011206065633.9E9953E4B@bazooka.trit.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> [011206 00:56] wrote:
> Is there any reason the definition of struct xucred shouldn't be
> MFC'd? I'd like to MFC my LOCAL_PEERCRED/getpeereid() changes, and
> would prefer not to have to use the old ucred for a new interface.
> I'm not planning to merge the changes to existing interfaces to use
> xucred as was done in current (this would probably cause unnecessary
> pain in -stable), I just want to merge the definition.
>
> Here's the change I'm talking about. Any objections?
Not if this is this extent of the patch, let's not break all the
ucred interfaces in -stable though, that would be bad.
> Index: ucred.h
> ===================================================================
--
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011206132715.X92148>