Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:15:40 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <4C05BECC.9030202@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4C0559C2.60300@stillbilde.net> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <AANLkTin-gJ5ehBsIB3c7VCqdivsiKf3kZdwXkod6Lgsf@mail.gmail.com> <86eigqol8l.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4C054335.4040802@stillbilde.net> <1275418622.1516.1.camel@pixi.PuffyBSD.Com> <4C0559C2.60300@stillbilde.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
FWIW, I support the import. I don't think GCC is as bad as other people think it is, but I also have been gravely concerned of the the reduction of toolchains down close to one in our business. That in and of itself warrants supporting any viable alternative.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C05BECC.9030202>