Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:14:37 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r269847 - in stable/10: contrib/apr contrib/apr/docs contrib/apr/encoding contrib/apr/file_io/unix contrib/apr/include contrib/apr/include/arch/unix contrib/apr/include/private contrib/... Message-ID: <201408141114.37992.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5874043.odmAkWF3cI@overcee.wemm.org> References: <53e9707c.2d6c.2d976b@svn.freebsd.org> <201408121119.32037.jhb@freebsd.org> <5874043.odmAkWF3cI@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:23:16 pm Peter Wemm wrote: > On Tuesday 12 August 2014 11:19:31 John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday, August 11, 2014 9:40:12 pm Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Author: peter > > > Date: Tue Aug 12 01:40:11 2014 > > > New Revision: 269847 > > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269847 > > > > > > Log: > > > MFC r266728,266731,266735,266736,268135,268960,269833 > > > > > > Update apr 1.4.8 -> 1.5.1 > > > Update apr-util 1.5.2 -> 1.5.3 > > > Update serf 1.3.4 -> 1.3.7 > > > Update svnlite 1.8.8 -> 1.8.10 > > > Deal with svnlite.1 manpage. > > > > Isn't this merge a little quick? 1.8.10 only went into head about 6 hours > > before this commit. The 1.8.8 merge to 10 was also rather quick (less than > > an hour after it was merged to HEAD). If the security issues noted in the > > commit for HEAD are severe enough to warrant an immediate merge, then there > > should probably be an advisory. Otherwise, I think svn updates should > > probably have some bake time in HEAD before going to stable. > > The jumbo-MFC was mostly to gather up the updates that have been baking in > head for a while. 10.1 is coming up soon. > > It just seemed silly to MFC everything except a specific, targeted security fix. > I suspect that for every question I got about including the security update, > I'd have received 5 times as many asking why I hadn't included it. Surely the MFC could have waited 3 days or so though? We generally default to having some sort of bake-in period for MFCs and only bypassing that if there is an urgent need (such as an SA). The code flush for 10.1 is still a week away. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201408141114.37992.jhb>