Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jul 1999 00:18:05 +1000
From:      obituary <c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Problem with cvsup
Message-ID:  <3793339D.297B21F3@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
References:  <3791BFE4.D18901D3@atlas.newcastle.edu.au> <xzp3dymnm2b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <37931C99.7038563D@atlas.newcastle.edu.au> <xzpiu7gn6yd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> obituary <c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au> writes:
> > pseudo-device   ppp     2               #Point-to-point protocol
> > options PPP_BSDCOMP                     #PPP BSD-compress support
> > options PPP_DEFLATE                     #PPP zlib/deflate/gzip support
> 
> Why are you using kernel pppd instead of userland ppp?

Why not?  Is there some issue regarding kernel pppd that I'm not aware
of?  I used kernel pppd simply because I assumed the kernel
implementation would be more efficient, and I'd had prior experience
using pppd (under Linux).


-jake (obituary)
c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3793339D.297B21F3>