Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:20:51 +0100 (BST) From: Andrew Tulloch <andrew@cosa.uk-legal.net> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>, "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@ptc.spbu.ru>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105301719260.9469-100000@cosa.uk-legal.net> In-Reply-To: <04a401c0e917$a968a120$931576d8@inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If you take a look at the cvs commit logs e.g. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/ip_fil.h you'll notice its Darren himself who does virtually all the commits on the ipf code in the FreeBSD tree, I'm going to assume he gave himself permisson :) Andrew On Wed, 30 May 2001, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > Someone on irc mentioned that something like ipf that cannot be modified > should go into the ports. Not my personal belief, but I thought I would > relay it anyhow. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> > To: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@ptc.spbu.ru>; <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:44 AM > Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well > > > > Nothing in that article has convinced me that FreeBSD developers can > change > > the source at their will and distribute it -- according to the IPFilter > > licence. That right should be implicit in ALL FreeBSD system level source > > code. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105301719260.9469-100000>