Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:25:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump(8) hosed on CURRENT Message-ID: <20030512222322.A600@korben.in.tern> In-Reply-To: <3EC00248.1040700@tcoip.com.br> References: <20030512215835.V600@korben.in.tern> <20030512221444.R47986@cvs.imp.ch> <3EC00248.1040700@tcoip.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Martin Blapp wrote: > > > >>I now did a test with dump -L on a live filesystem, and I've seen the > >>"file expected but not found" error, too. There's obviously something > >>broken, we should check if it's related to -L or if it happens always. > > > > I just tested it without "-L" on a live, but not active filesystem. > > The restore finishes fine and everything seems to be there. > > > > So dump -L is broken :-( > > Now, how about making a snapshot and backing that up instead of using -L? The -L flag to dump takes a snapshot. And if you create it by hand with mksnap_ffs(8) you probably back it up with dump (the trick in the dump source is to create the snapshot, open it and then unlink it). regards, le --=20 Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at UNIX-Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID) Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 der Universit=E4t Wien http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030512222322.A600>