Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 19:20:24 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 950210-SNAP Problems ... Message-ID: <199503140020.TAA04388@hda.com> In-Reply-To: <199503132126.WAA00618@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Mar 13, 95 10:26:30 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J Wunsch writes: > > As Peter Dufault wrote: > > > > > Just an idea: wouldn't it make sense to print another line at least > > > for the most commons ASC's? Something like: > > > > > > /kernel: sd0(ncr0:0:0): asc 47 = PARITY ERROR > > > > > > > Yes, except that if you have the SCSI spec look at how many there > > are: four pages. I'd guess there are roughly 200. > ... > > Of course 200 codes times about 24 bytes per code is only 4800 bytes. > > I don't think it's too much bloat for a 800 - 1000 K kernel. Saves > people allot of trouble, and not all of us do know the ASC/ASCQ's by > heart (like you :). The SCSI spec is now parked next to my desk (along with the workshop manuals for my cars; I'm on those mailing lists too). In "real life" I primarily do medical instrumentation control and not SCSI work (or car repair). Peter -- Peter Dufault Real Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503140020.TAA04388>