Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:06:25 +0300 From: =?utf-8?B?0JjQs9C+0YDRjCDQp9GD0LTQvtCy?= <nir@sarfsc.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Speculative: Rust for base system components Message-ID: <33602211546243585@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> In-Reply-To: <39272.1546241776@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <ca76e5f7-6e59-bd67-144a-90ad66f0252e@metricspace.net> <39272.1546241776@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! That sounds nice. Is there any requirements or wiki page for BSystemD implementation? --- With best regards, Igor Chudov. Saratov Free Software Center Work phone: +7 8452 98-78-18 Work (mobile) phone: +7 917 208-78-18 Personal (mobile) phone: +7 937 266-51-34 31.12.2018, 10:40, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>: > So the only piece of code I can imagine which would ever come close > to qualifying, would be if somebody starts writing BSystemD(8) > from scratch. > > And I'm 100% convinced that people will want that optional and firmly > segregated in a port for at least the first a decade. > > And as far as I know, we *are* trying to make base more modular, and > migrate it to pkgbase to make the attachment of/to ports more > seamless, right?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33602211546243585>