Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:26:56 -0500 From: Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: python@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>, Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Expiration of devel/py-[c]elementtree Message-ID: <4EBD9320.5030508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EBD1578.7030906@yandex.ru> References: <4EBD1578.7030906@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/11 7:30 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Good day! > > We have two pr's here: > http://bugs.freebsd.org/155524 > http://bugs.freebsd.org/155526 > > And the last consumer of them in the tree was fixed today. > Since python 2.5 we have xml.etree.ElementTree and > xml.etree.cElementTree in the standard library. This package are drop-in > replacement for aforementioned ports, except of HTMLTreeBuilder class > that is missing. But we don't have ports that use it anyway. > > All the modern software uses or bundled xml.etree or lxml > (devel/py-lxml) or html5lib (www/py-html5lib) instead. So i want to ask > is there any objections if I mark them deprecated and remove in one month? > > My sense is these ports should be set to expire at the same time as python 2.4. When is that change going to be made to its Makefile? Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk69kyAACgkQ0sRouByUApCTBQCeP/0lGemZ4ciewF54dwL5EW1q WZUAoMGBMitSi6+bc7W4H5NiTHbvMKNh =NBav -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EBD9320.5030508>