Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:21:16 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: __P(()) Macro
Message-ID:  <20020319222116.GV455@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <200203192213.g2JMDmC00899@beastie.mckusick.com>
References:  <3C97B0B1.BF6AFBCA@mindspring.com> <200203192213.g2JMDmC00899@beastie.mckusick.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> [020319 14:20] wrote:
> 	Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:42:09 -0800
> 	From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
> 	To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
> 	CC: arch@freebsd.org
> 	Subject: Re: __P(()) Macro
> 
> 	Kirk McKusick wrote:
> 	> OpenBSD has completed the cleanup of the __P(()) macro.
> 	> While we have agreed in principle to do the same, I note
> 	> many instances of __P(()) still exist. Hopefully someone
> 	> will take the bull by the horns and grunt through this task.
> 	> 
> 	>         Kirk McKusick
> 
> 	I assume that only someone with -current sources could do
> 	this?  I.e. the delta is only applicable against -current,
> 	not -stable, so it will be a 5.0 thing, not a 4.6 thing?
> 
> 	-- Terry
> 
> It would be my assumption that this would only happen in the
> 5.0 tree.

I'm making the sweep through the kernel now, may I touch ufs/ffs
or would that hinder your current devel?

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020319222116.GV455>