Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:37:47 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) Message-ID: <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <ngfyczz0n3.fsf@hanbruch.tg.intern> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <a6647e120611051214m2dfb1603u208da669ebfeba0@mail.gmail.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Norberto Meijome writes: > > You should be able to compile without mozilla all together and then > > specify an external web browser in eclipse. Of-course you will loose the > > features in eclipse that rely on the embedded browser. > > How feasible would be to include with the port the mozilla binary > blobs ? maybe accessible via a tunable WITH_MOZILLA_BLOBS=yes Given that mozilla/mozilla is a dead branch, wouldn't a better question be "When are things going to be updated to understand mozilla/firefox and mozilla/seamonkey?"? I understand this is not a trivial process ... on the other hand Firefox has been out for how many years? Robert Huff* * - who's getting @!#$%^&* tired of installing/deinstalling mozilla/mozilla everytime somebody needs this build-depends.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17745.6347.242231.222424>