Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:45:46 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf LINT Message-ID: <19990929144546.H70023@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <25018.938558832@localhost> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909252325360.2736-100000@alphplex.bde.org> <25018.938558832@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I thought it was intentional (to keep soft updates linted). We don't > > distribute binaries for LINT. > > No, but LINT is supposed to compile all the way through so you can > also lint everything after the point where the soft updates object > builds would fail due to missing symlinks on a "stock" system. :) The question is who uses LINT as a compile tool (as opposed to a reference tool). I think having softupdates in there makes sensel; my comment to phk was due to this being an obvious side-effect change, not something that seemed to be done deliberately. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990929144546.H70023>