Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:26:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270283] would like an even safer LIST_FOREACH_SAFE() Message-ID: <bug-270283-227-xsVH0hW5vD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-270283-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-270283-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270283 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kib@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- In such situation, where you have a possibility of uncontrolled removal of = the list elements, usual approach is to put a marker element on the list. The marker should be not subject for removal by any regular operations. See e.g. MNT_VNODE_FOREACH* and vm_pageout.c (search for marker). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270283-227-xsVH0hW5vD>