Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:23:54 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/weekly 400.status-pkg Message-ID: <49813.985541034@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:20:45 -0800." <20010325092045.A24469@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010325092045.A24469@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl wr ites: >On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:35:23AM -0800, Brian Somers wrote: >> brian 2001/03/25 03:35:23 PST >> >> Modified files: >> etc/periodic/weekly 400.status-pkg >> Log: >> Identify obsolete ports >> > >Is this really a good idea? I have 29 ports that are >considered obsolete on my system. One of those 29 >is png-1.0.8. If I blindly update png, do I then >need to update all the ports that depend on png: Despite all the good things one can say about our ports system, I don't think anyone should do anything "blindly" to their installed ports. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49813.985541034>