Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:37:31 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: inetd.conf -- IPv6 telnet
Message-ID:  <20010727123727.A46663@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010727152758.87459A-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from arr@watson.org on Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:29:21PM -0400
References:  <20010727114029.C31276@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010727152758.87459A-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:29:21PM -0400, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
>=20
> consistency in terms of inetd.conf #'ing out telnet from being started,
> this is completely disregarding what has occured lately from the
> vulnerability.=20
>=20
> in inetd.conf, it comments the ipv4 telnetd so it wont be started (by
> default).  But in ipv6 telnetd, it does not... Just wondering about some
> consistency with taht.

I show both of them uncommented by default, and the advisory tells you
to comment both out.

Kris

--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7YcL3Wry0BWjoQKURAif4AKDCaEb7RxbQ49zXviyhnX9gcdhRxgCfTWAG
sg3tBVzO2liFaIce7+YUxCY=
=fX7x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010727123727.A46663>