Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 05 Jan 2002 00:59:58 +0100
From:      "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <drwilco@drwilco.net>
To:        "Cambria, Mike" <mcambria@avaya.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: TCP connection via IPsec machine also running natd
Message-ID:  <5.1.0.14.0.20020105005712.01cdcc50@mail.drwilco.net>
In-Reply-To: <3A6D367EA1EFD4118C9B00A0C9DD99D7065399@rerun.lucentctc.com >

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>As I said earlier, packets which route through ipfw/natd get unencrypted and
>make it to the remote subnet just fine.
>
>Looking at   'ipfw -a l'   it seems that the ESP packets are being received
>_after_ being diverted to natd, but just
>not sent to the socket:

I'm no IPsec expert (still something I need to look into) but something 
that springs to mind is to allow the packet before the natd divert. I 
couldn't say why this would work (since natd shouldn't touch the packet, 
and you say other packets go through fine), but it's just a hunch =)

         DocWilco


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20020105005712.01cdcc50>