Date: 01 Feb 2001 19:31:43 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>, Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: chrooting bind Message-ID: <xzpk87auueo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Stefan Molnar's message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:26:44 -0800 (PST)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102011024300.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes: > I see where you are coming from now. On this system I attempted > to be more complete, basicly give it everything That totally defeats the point of running in a sandbox. > and attempt to > depend on nothing outside the sandbox. The point is to have as little as possible inside the sandbox. You need named-xfer if you have slave zones, but you do not need any other binaries, you do not need any libraries (link named-xfer statically!) and you certainly don't need any device nodes. ANYTHING YOU PUT IN THE SANDBOX WILL BE AVAILABLE TO INTRUDERS WHEN THEY BREAK INTO YOUR SYSTEM. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk87auueo.fsf>