Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:28:40 +0200 From: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd patch regression? Message-ID: <521DD0D8.5020609@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1377644312.6359.27.camel@localhost> References: <1377644312.6359.27.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 28.08.2013 00:58, schrieb Sean Bruno:
> Colin generated a patch for xen things that does some pretty
> typical behavior. bsdpatch really didn't handle it well and
> rejected some things and flat out refused to create
> sys/modules/xenhvm/Makefile for me.
I cannot reproduce the last point: sys/modules/xenhvm/Makefile
has been created in my tests ...
Regarding the XENHVM files: The diff contains unexpanded $FreeBSD$
lines, while the files in /sys/conf/{amd64,i386} have them expanded,
e.g.:
# $FreeBSD$
vs.
# $FreeBSD: head/sys/amd64/conf/XENHVM 239228 2012-08-13 07:36:57Z
cperciva $
You may want to repeat the test with correct $FreeBSD$ lines ...
Regards, STefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521DD0D8.5020609>