Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:58:02 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        drosih@rpi.edu
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX
Message-ID:  <20131028165802.GX52889@glebius.int.ru>
In-Reply-To: <201310281648.r9SGmlQQ008874@smtp10.server.rpi.edu>
References:  <201310281648.r9SGmlQQ008874@smtp10.server.rpi.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:49:14PM -0400, drosih@rpi.edu wrote:
d> As far as the kernel-level support, I assume you're just removing all
d> the code tied to the kernel options NETATALK and NETATALKDEBUG?  Or does
d> it entail some other changes, which might wreck my custom compile of CAP?

Yes, that is the plan.

If remove of NETATALK hurts your build, we can work this out. Either
leave some header in system, or move it into your custom build.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131028165802.GX52889>