Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:43 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld broken with NO_MODULES= and MODULES_WITH_WORLD= Message-ID: <74182532@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060217122939.GE80363@ip.net.ua> (Ruslan Ermilov's message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:29:39 %2B0200") References: <27781308@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060217105540.GC80363@ip.net.ua> <06347782@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060217122939.GE80363@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:29:39 +0200 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 02:29:13PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > Unless you really need it for some reason, the MODULES_WITH_WORLD option > > > is harmful -- it produces modules that aren't guaranteed to be compatible > > > with your kernel. > > > > Hm, do you mean to say that "modules (binaries) depend on kernel > > configuration"? > > > Sure, a lot. When built with the kernel, modules use options > for that kernel, e.g. if your kernel was compiled without IPv6 > support your modules will be loadable. If you build them > standalone, and don't provide the NO_INET6 make option, these > modules won't load. Got it. Thanks. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74182532>