Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:51:54 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alexbl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, ports-developers@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org, vd@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: The way to fix ports/104560 Message-ID: <1169578314.3659.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070123183158.CD86E39C4C@cherenkov.geekfire.com> References: <20070123104738.GA41157@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <1169549704.6221.10.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20070123112924.4023339F66@cherenkov.geekfire.com> <1169558939.6221.32.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20070123183158.CD86E39C4C@cherenkov.geekfire.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Alexander Botero-Lowry píše v út 23. 01. 2007 v 10:34 -0800:
> >
> > --DSPAM_MULTIPART_EX-85454
> > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-si
> > gnature"; boundary="=-IDyhv9ael/t7m1qkoJDV"
> >
> > --=-IDyhv9ael/t7m1qkoJDV
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > Alexander Botero-Lowry p=ED=B9e v =FAt 23. 01. 2007 v 03:31 -0800:
> > > > > Please take a look at ports/104560 (and also ports/105853 and
> > > > > ports/106120) and come to a consensus what is the right way to fix th=
> > is
> > > > > issue.
> > > > >=3D20
> > > > > I am sure we can come to an agreement and shortly commit a fix.
> > > >=20
> > > > As I see it:
> > > >=20
> > > > - lang/python metaport must be removed
> > > > - all lang/python2? ports will install $PREFIX/bin/python binary
> > > >=20
> > > > How that sounds?
> > > >=20
> > > > Or if people absolutely need to have several different pythons on a
> > > > system, make the bin/python automatical symlink, like in perl ports.
> >
> > > This fails to deal with installing the site-packages in the appropriate
> > > site-package directories.
> >
> > How so? You don't need to have interpreter called python2.5 to install
> > into 2.5's sitelibdir.
> You absolutely do. THe pyc and pyo files are part of the package list and
> have to be generated by the installation process. So you must have python2.5
> to install to the python 2.5 site-packages.
Unless your bin/python is actually 2.5 python.
I see two possible ways out:
1) patch a lot of python using ports to call ${PYTHON} instead of python
2) create a tool, that will set up PREFIX/bin/python to be a symlink or
a copy of a python2X binary the user desires to use at a moment,
prior the start of compilation. `use.perl port' equivalent, really.
Approach number one takes a lot of patching. Approach number two imposes
an administrative burden on end users.
We should pick on of these approaches, and commit to it.
Debate?
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
94 outdated ports on the box,
94 outdated ports.
Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
82 outdated ports on the box.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBFtllKntdYP8FOsoIRAslYAJ9xPZZfPYUjwgyqCH5JUnvRIfwSmQCffpmB
Np66iMDVdRJYklQCzqTZ0PU=
=mc4q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1169578314.3659.6.camel>