Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 02:35:11 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: wosch@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/top/files m_freebsd21.c m_freebsd21.man defaults ports/sysutils/top Makefile Message-ID: <199602131035.CAA02430@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199602121722.SAA00550@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:22:42 %2B0100 (MET))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > freebsd20 -> freebsd21 module * * Should have been freebsd22. Sigh. I've raised my objection before. Yeah I thought "why is it 21"? What's the issue here? Why is Wolfram committing a file for 2.1 in the 2.2-current ports tree (although it appears to work for 2.2-current as well)? Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602131035.CAA02430>