Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:21:26 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: diskless and 3Com 509 Message-ID: <199503161721.JAA11807@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199503161339.HAA26203@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Mar 16, 95 07:39:30 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I've seen a lot of criticism of BSD-derived telnets because you can't use > them for Q&D smtp or nntp information snarfing because they exit on EOF. > Apparently USG-derived ones wait for the other end to shut down if stdin > is a plain file. I'd like some inputs on the pros and cons of copying the > USG behaviour in this case. well, go fix it :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503161721.JAA11807>