Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:59:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=%2BwEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com> References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BtpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=%2BwEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> long term goals. Eliminating, or at least not being dependent on a GNU > toolchain. GPL v3 brings with it a whole host problems such as: As you already know i don't like GPL very much. As i already said for me GNU is computer communism. But like or not like, i don't prefer my likeness above facts and FreeBSD performance. And the facts are against clang. BUT PLEASE stop offtopic explaining about secure boot problems and answer one clear question: What exactly GPLv3 have wrong that we can use gcc in longer term for FreeBSD system? OK? Can you just answer that simple question clearly?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564>