Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 1996 23:10:32 +0100
From:      "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        jfieber@indiana.edu (John Fieber), rhh@ct.picker.com, p.richards@elsevier.co.uk, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Er... how long 
Message-ID:  <292.833407832@palmer.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 May 1996 11:09:53 PDT." <199605291809.LAA13861@phaeton.artisoft.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote in message ID
<199605291809.LAA13861@phaeton.artisoft.com>:
> > For the record, if you use elm's filter, one day you *will* loose
> > mail.  This is not a matter of if, but when.  This is a platform
> > independent "feature", not a quirk in the freebsd version.  Do
> > the right thing and use procmail.  Unfortunately, the syntax of
> > procmail rules file are a little obtuse when compared to filter
> > but I guess it makes for faster parsing. 

> What race condition do you believe exists such that this will
> happen?

It's not a race condition, it's a programming bogon. If the subject
line is beyond a certain length the elm filter coredumps. I've seen
this happen when I've made large commits (which produced a long
`Subject:' line) before cvs-commiters got an ``owner'' which gets the
mail. It is a good way of testing who uses the elm filter program :-)

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?292.833407832>