Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 03:10:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> Cc: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update to patch(1) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008010305050.86459-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007020752520.6709-100000@gateway.posi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Kelly Yancey wrote: > > Can someone please review the patches in PR 19642. They merge in many > changes to patch(1) from OpenBSD. Specifically, they remove the standard > mktemp race condition as well as fix some potential buffer overflows. Sorry for the delay. Some comments: * be consistent about sizeof(foo) vs sizeof foo (choose whichever the surrounding file uses) * system() is insecure - there's no point in making all the string operations buffer-safe if you go and pass a user string to system() :-) * mkstemp() + close() isn't a drop-in replacement for mktemp() since it will leave tempfiles around if the program exits through an abnormal channel (error condition, signal, etc). mkstemp() + unlink() is usually okay if the program (or another program) doesn't need to reopen the same file, although it needs more source-code modification. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008010305050.86459-100000>