Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:50:53 +0100
From:      Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc:        "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>, Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1012390758.50933b@mired.org>, chip <chip@wiegand.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bad disk partitioning policies (was: "Re: FreeBSD Intaller(was  "Re:   ... RedHat ...")")
Message-ID:  <p05101206b879b58fa8d5@[10.0.1.14]>
In-Reply-To: <3C5345A0.68D0CE99@mindspring.com>
References:  <20020123124025.A60889@HAL9000.wox.org>	 <3C4F5BEE.294FDCF5@mindspring.com> <20020123223104.SM01952@there>	 <p0510122eb875d9456cf4@[10.0.1.3]>	 <15440.35155.637495.417404@guru.mired.org>	 <p0510123fb876493753e0@[10.0.1.3]>	 <15440.53202.747536.126815@guru.mired.org>	 <p05101242b876db6cd5d7@[10.0.1.3]>	 <15441.17382.77737.291074@guru.mired.org>	 <p05101245b8771d04e19b@[10.0.1.3]> <20020125212742.C75216@over-yonder.net> <p05101203b8788a930767@[10.0.1.14]> <3C5345A0.68D0CE99@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 4:11 PM -0800 2002/01/26, Terry Lambert wrote:

>  85% hash fill is 85% hash fill.
>
>  If you have an arbitrary sized hash table, then why do you
>  somehow think the probability of a hash collision goes down
>  as the size of the hash table goes up, if the relative load
>  on the hash table increases until it is the same percentage
>  of the total hash table size?

	But this isn't my understanding of how the filesystem works. 
If hash tables are used, they are only used locally, and elsewhere we 
use a digraph.  If this weren't the case, then we would have never, 
ever had problems with directory size and storing many millions of 
files in a single directory.

	Yes, I realize that dirprefs and dirhash change this scenario 
somewhat with more modern versions of FreeBSD, but I still don't 
believe that they change the filesystem/inode behaviour to use a 
global "perfect hash".

>  Please search for "perfect hash" in the NEC "Cite Seer" CS
>  reference database.

	This is the first I've heard of this database.  Can you provide an URL?

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05101206b879b58fa8d5>