Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:22:44 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] VM & VFS changes Message-ID: <20050601152244.cgb5pjihw4w4ssgg@netchild.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <41216.1117630645@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <41216.1117630645@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> Maybe the simplest solution is also the best: keep track of the
> dependencies and do the cleanup leaf->root on the resulting tree.
How many userland processes have to be running and consuming memory which
isn't available as physical RAM at this point in the shutdown sequence?
Wouldn't a loop like the following be enough?
while swap
umount unbusy-FS
swap-off swap
This assumes that swap-off doesn't turns off the swap if it isn't able to put
everything back into other swap or physical RAM areas.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
The electrician didn't know what the yellow cable was so he yanked the
ethernet out.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050601152244.cgb5pjihw4w4ssgg>