Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 20:15:10 -0500 From: "Steve Sims" <SimsS@IBM.Net> To: "Nate Williams" <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sio probes broken in PAO-970210? Message-ID: <199703060115.BAA31131@out2.ibm.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> > > Sorry, Nate - I don't follow you.... Do you mean "A clean 2.2-GAMMA > > install doesn't have the patches from PAO"? If so, this I understand. > > Yes, that's what I meant. :) > > > If you mean "the 970210 PAO tarball doesn't have sio changes folded in" > > then I don't understand at all. less'ing sys.patch, I can see mods to > > sio.c and they got applied to my kernel source code when I installed the > > PAO-970210 patch(es). > > No, you need to apply the PAO patches to 2.2 to get working SIO support > for your laptop. > > > > You can get the PAO patches to 2.2 and see if they help. Been there, done that. I started with ssys.?? for 2.2-GAMMA, then applied PAO-970210 off the PAO home page. (They purport to be in alpha-test against 2.2-GAMMA) then config'ed my kernel, make'ed it, install'ed it and rebooted. No joy. > > Where? Something I've missed? > > The PAO patches are against 2.2Gamma, aren't they? I assume so; the sys.patch applies cleanly against a pristing 2.2-GAMMA source deck. Still hunting for a clue.... ...sjs...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703060115.BAA31131>