Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:30:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r415188 - head/lang/gcc6-devel Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1605160928470.2881@anthias.pfeifer.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1605141557500.2881@anthias.pfeifer.com> References: <201605141350.u4EDoYK1007614@repo.freebsd.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1605141557500.2881@anthias.pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I find it troublesome for infrastructure changes to happen without > taking basic tools like portlint into account. > > After the PORTSDIR removal, the introduction of TIMESTAMP is at > least the second case this year, and my current plan is not to > commit changes that would add warnings with the latest version. > of portlint. (Hence the above is the full diff for distinfo.) I noticed that portlint has been updated in between my commit and the (delayed) note above, which is good. The general point still stands, though. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.2.20.1605160928470.2881>