Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:22:00 +0000 From: linuxgpletc@redchan.it To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net> Cc: Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@gmail.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, misc@openbsd.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: GRSec is vital to Linux security Message-ID: <a4ae3c98c10eeac39c404b60a0e4d538@redchan.it> In-Reply-To: <3efc6268-747d-0841-4249-5804fa9095ca@metux.net> References: <fe8a4e103943d671ff0ce2c4f09609f9@redchan.it> <CAAaskFDMjUzonLeHPmiy_VcB=jvQfF9giEaWcmNLKHDTqQt4BA@mail.gmail.com> <3efc6268-747d-0841-4249-5804fa9095ca@metux.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2019-01-24 15:31, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Do you have some actual proposals / patches ? Sue Open Source Security / Bradly Spengler for copyright infringement. Seek his profits as damages. I doubt you'll be able to get specific performance since the GPL is not a contact in this instance. (If you registered your copyright prior to the violation you can alternatively go for statutory damages + attoneys fees btw) He is _blatantly_ violating your copyright by adding an additional restrictive term regarding the distribution of his non-separable derivative work of the linux kernel code.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a4ae3c98c10eeac39c404b60a0e4d538>