Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:46:58 -0700 From: Farooq Mela <fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quick question about x86 asm Message-ID: <3B567452.36965E56@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> References: <3B554445.193CE946@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> <3B55BD97.A6E40F1E@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > > cc -S is your friend. Right, well that can certainly help, but what gcc generates can be dependant on calling convention, optimization setting, &c &c, and though the code generated in one particular scenario may not be an absolute indicator of it's behavior. In other words, I was looking for more of a "yes" or "no" type response ;-). Anyway, redirecting this question to a gcc list. -- farooq <fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B567452.36965E56>