Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:40:24 +0200 From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weird fxp / timecounter interaction in top-of-tree Message-ID: <xzp4r5bmpuv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <28635.1049653552@critter.freebsd.dk> ("Poul-Henning Kamp"'s message of "Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:25:52 %2B0200") References: <28635.1049653552@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > > and tc_init() to use the *first* timecounter it runs across (on i386, > > this is generally the i8254), leaving the admin to pick another one if > > the default does not suit her. See the attached patch. > This is wrong. Please do not commit it. OK. Any suggestion as to how we could rank timecounters so we can switch to a better one when it becomes available? Is this something we can determine statically (with a compiled-in preference list), or do we have to determine it at run time? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp4r5bmpuv.fsf>