Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:21:02 +0800
From:      Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>
To:        David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys sched.h src/sys/posix4 ksched.c src/sys/kern sched_4bsd.c sched_core.c sched_ule.c
Message-ID:  <1150363262.937.44.camel@spirit>
In-Reply-To: <200606150637.k5F6bdax000157@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200606150637.k5F6bdax000157@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hi, David,

在 2006-06-15四的 06:37 +0000,David Xu写道:
> davidxu     2006-06-15 06:37:39 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/sys              sched.h 
>     sys/posix4           ksched.c 
>     sys/kern             sched_4bsd.c sched_core.c sched_ule.c 
>   Log:
>   Add scheduler API sched_relinquish(), the API is used to implement
>   yield() and sched_yield() syscalls. Every scheduler has its own way
>   to relinquish cpu, the ULE and CORE schedulers have two internal run-
>   queues, a timesharing thread which calls yield() syscall should be
>   moved to inactive queue.

A question that might be related:  We have sched_sizeof_proc(), etc. in
every scheduler, which returns a constant.  Is it worthy to convert them
to constants that just expand inline during the kernel compile?

Cheers,
-- 
Xin LI <delphij delphij net>    http://www.delphij.net/

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEkSZ+hcUczkLqiksRAvBuAKCdzxsnuzEljEhrCPnFNUMqvEgoxACgoIQl
hEJoVoPlFfdX0iD+u1YeaVc=
=36ZL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1150363262.937.44.camel>