Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 02:28:50 +0100 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PKGBASE Removes FreeBSD Base System Feature Message-ID: <aJVS0tsV5oehOBPH@int21h> In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjmc8K-vOPB0rQpWERejwLTc4kkM3623EjFRzRLTTK5qsA@mail.gmail.com> References: <zxdjhwcktnktdqzisgzy@qkoz> <FD0B239A-7DE4-4588-840E-C31FBBECBBEF@submonkey.net> <pecwwvnjxkiaplcpxkph@fpas> <CAFYkXjmc8K-vOPB0rQpWERejwLTc4kkM3623EjFRzRLTTK5qsA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 01:43:28AM +0200, Tomek CEDRO wrote: >+1 =) > >Base and Userland should be clearly separated, as it was, as it is, no >matter how it will be organized internally (i.e. modular base) :-) +1 here also. Why not avoid breaking POLA by having a differently-named binary for pkgbase management? Different switches, too. --home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aJVS0tsV5oehOBPH>