Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:28:52 -0400 From: Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> To: Ganael Laplanche <ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EFI/ZFS Update: successful tests, need more complex vdevs Message-ID: <5ED4AE5E-8508-409B-B323-2CBFEBE77088@metricspace.net> In-Reply-To: <201510211345.29460.ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com> References: <56211825.3080403@metricspace.net> <201510211345.29460.ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Outstanding. Based on these tests, the reports of successful testing of UFS loading, the fact that PCBSD and NextBSD have apparently picked it up, and the fact that I've been using it for months, I think it's time to move towards getting it committed. I'll post an updated patch by the end of the week. On October 21, 2015 7:45:29 AM EDT, Ganael Laplanche <ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com> wrote: >On Friday, October 16, 2015 05:30:45 PM Eric McCorkle wrote: > >Hi Eric, > >> In general, I need testing on ZFS setups with more complex vdevs >(l2arc, >intent logs, mirroring, striping, raidz, etc.) > >I have successfully run the following tests, on a server with 3 SSDs >and >following the method I explained in my previous post (i.e. booting from > >patched loader.efi, *not* boot1.efi), see: >https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2015-August/048141.html > >1) Single disk + SLOG + L2ARC > ># zpool status > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested >config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > da0p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > logs > da2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > cache > da1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > >errors: No known data errors > >=> Boot OK, the pool is up and running with logs and cache online > >2) Striping on 3 disks > ># zpool status > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested >config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > da0p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da1p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da2p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > >errors: No known data errors > >=> Boot OK > >3) Mirroring on 3 disks > ># zpool status > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested >config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da0p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da1p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da2p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > >errors: No known data errors > >=> Boot OK > >4) Raidz on 3 disks > ># zpool status > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested >config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da0p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da1p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da2p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > >errors: No known data errors > >=> Boot OK > >As Andrew asked, do you have an updated patch ? Or is the code >available on >some repository ? > >Thanks again for your great work, >Regards, > >-- >Ganaël LAPLANCHE <ganael.laplanche@corp.ovh.com> -- Sent from my Blackphone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 17:34:37 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B34A1BAFF for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@frebsd.org) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C13418DC; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@frebsd.org) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE474F860; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9LHYSRi035099; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:29 GMT (envelope-from phk@frebsd.org) To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: instability of timekeeping In-reply-to: <56274FFC.2000608@FreeBSD.org> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@frebsd.org> References: <56261398.60102@FreeBSD.org> <56261FE6.90302@FreeBSD.org> <56274FFC.2000608@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <35097.1445448868.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:28 +0000 Message-ID: <35098.1445448868@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:39:51 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:37 -0000 -------- > Another thing that occurred to me is that TSC-low.mask / > TSC-low.frequency ≈ 2.7 seconds. That's why I suspect timecounters aren't being wound up as they should be. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ED4AE5E-8508-409B-B323-2CBFEBE77088>