Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:50:37 +1100 (EST) From: Nicholas Charles Brawn <ncb05@uow.edu.au> To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@iijlab.net> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, Juergen Nickelsen <ni@tellique.de>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipsec (VPN) for -current ? (Re: VPN through encrypted IP tunnel for FreeBSD? ) Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.02A.9811051946510.13428-100000@banshee.cs.uow.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <21126.910252398@coconut.itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh wrote: : : >> OpenBSD seems to have it ... well, would it be possible to : >> import this stuff and test it under -current ? : >Stephanie Wehner has already done this, though I don't know when : >she'll be ready to have it committed; I got mail from her yesterday : >saying she had some updates. : : mmm, if it gets committed, what happens to IPsec part of KAME stack? : if core team wishes to get IPsec is from OpenBSD and IPv6 from KAME, : who will take care about merging? It will be a hard job. Let's also not forget about the added effort we'll need to add hooks for export-level encryption (56 bits), but making strong-level encryption available as a package from an international site. We don't want to have the problem of being unable to export FreeBSD due to ITAR/EAR restrictions. Thankfully the photuris port is currently located outside of the US, as is the great work being done with KAME. :) : itojun Nick -- Email: ncb05@uow.edu.au - http://rabble.uow.edu.au/~nick Key fingerprint = DE 30 33 D3 16 91 C8 8D A7 F8 70 03 B7 77 1A 2A To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.02A.9811051946510.13428-100000>