Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:00:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inter-VM networking with FreeBSD under bhyve Message-ID: <201908211600.x7LG0iup054418@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <099cc2bb-2647-d012-ca27-f57a99b49010@vangyzen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Thanks for the replies, everyone. > > > Do you have any desired parameters? > > Performance Driven? Simplicity? > I failed to mention that. I'm interested in performance, especially low > CPU overhead. Then a netmap based solution is probably in line with your goal. > I had tried vale+tap on a stable/12 host, but it wouldn't pass traffic, > so I started this thread as a feeler for what was expected to work on > which branches. Since then, I updated the host to head, and vale+tap works. > > I'm very interested in vale+ptnetmap. It seems to be partially > committed to head, but not entirely. Is that right? I am not well informed as to the state of this. > Thanks again. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201908211600.x7LG0iup054418>