Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 17:24:36 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: some forward progress on dynamic devices Message-ID: <199510050024.RAA00885@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199510041052.DAA02038@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Oct 4, 95 03:52:02 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> A little cleaning up to do then I'm planning on launching into > ALL THE DEVICES and adding similar dynamic stuff (ifdef'ed out by default) > the aim is to be able to flick a switch and go fully dynamic, but until then > I want to make sure nothing breaks. 8-) 8-). > in this app they can't be lkms.. but it'd be nice.. > I think the next hurdle to be cleared is fully dynamic > interrupt assignment, so an lkm driver can > dynamically decide which vector and which ipl.. > > this is starting to be fun again.. Yup! 8-). We knew it was just a matter of getting to a stable point after doing the update o the 4.4Lite source base before we could start ripping things apart. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510050024.RAA00885>