Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:37:52 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bumping libreoffice Message-ID: <51156220.4040207@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <20130208203538.GA57852@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <511548F2.4030303@bsdforen.de> <20130208201926.GB55651@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130208203538.GA57852@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/02/2013 21:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:19:27PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:50:26PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>> Please take note of Porters' Handbook section 5.2.2.1. >>> >>> Build fixes are NOT a reason to bump portrevision! >>> >> >> >> Have a look at the history Jung-uk has never done any graticious bump on this >> port. >> >> I personnally resigned on maintaining LibreOffice exactly because of reactions >> like this one, (also because Jung-uk Kim is actually doing a far better job on >> it than me :)). >> >> regards, >> Bapt > > > Sorry I probably over-reacted because I still remember the frustrations from > when I maintained LibreOffice. No, I'm grateful for you telling me that my e-mail was offensive. I'd just like to know how it offended, so that I can avoid this in the future. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51156220.4040207>