Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:49 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801 Message-ID: <17078.59561.284802.755226@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050620094835.Q19830@fledge.watson.org> References: <20050619155228.Y6413@fledge.watson.org> <66959.1119209763@critter.freebsd.dk> <m2br613i8n.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <p0621021dbedbfa4dd5ff@[128.113.24.47]> <20050620094835.Q19830@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:58:46 +0100 (BST), Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > - Providing more complete NO_xxx functionality, identifying more > components that can easily be frobbed. I.e., I have local patches for > NO_ACL and NO_MAC that remove small but useful functional subsets that I > may get a chance to commit for 6.0, or may not. We should, at a minimum, look at the POSIX options and profiling support. Many of these issues have been considered by other groups before, so let's not reinvent the wheel until and unless we have measured the previous attempts and found pi equal to 2.818. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17078.59561.284802.755226>