Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:19:53 -0000 From: KT Sin <sinkeyteck@yahoo.com> To: Tomasz Kowalczyk <kowalczt@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel driver patch 11.0 Message-ID: <20111120041332.GA20467@sedev.central.corp.tw1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <201111191853.27495.kowalczt@gmail.com> References: <20111119105155.GA1330@wolfman.devio.us> <201111191438.18121.kowalczt@gmail.com> <20111119170533.GT50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201111191853.27495.kowalczt@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
been seeing rejects for i915 too. can you please share with us your workaround? On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Tomasz Kowalczyk wrote: > On Saturday 19 of November 2011 18:05:33 Kostik Belousov wrote: > > The latest version of the patch is always for latest _HEAD_. > > I have no intent or spare cycles to maintain the backport to 9. > > Since there are some bits of VM infrastructure that finally got > > committed to HEAD, they are removed from the patch. It means that > > current patch set is not usable on 9 at all. > > Thanks for clarifying that. I don't track changes in HEAD that much and didn't > know that. Before patch 11.0 i used 9.0-rc, but now I switched to current, so > its working almost untouched(almost ,becouse yesterday i had some rejects from > i915_suspend.c on 12.1.patch, on fresh current sources ;p, but i managed to do > workaround). > And for today update of xf86-video-intel-kms to 2.17, my box works just good. > Before that when i was enabling compositing in kde, X sometimes was hanging in > edid recheck loop, which caused very big cpu usage. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111120041332.GA20467>