Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Dec 2013 04:38:51 +0000
From:      "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>
To:        Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk>
Cc:        Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>
Subject:   Re: 10.0-BETA4 bsdinstall zfs encryption broken
Message-ID:  <41DA6C6E-1D37-424A-B3EB-6A5CD8ECB022@fisglobal.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131204230155.GA40375@anubis.morrow.me.uk>
References:  <CAAoTqfu904a=W8zZ_170bjVUUeqxe-Jajo_W=g%2BU2vk%2BwTdaeg@mail.gmail.com> <099CD122-B7D8-4FC1-9C99-F19248418CD0@fisglobal.com> <CAAoTqftxt74DEWjxeYtpaiavqiuj8_gawY4%2BGpHirWM-FPaKQQ@mail.gmail.com> <A7DF3606-B33E-4117-A1DB-FE759E0A0E5F@fisglobal.com> <CAAoTqfvaPb4go_d7aeU0sepmPAGey1WuAtxVYsour11DVTguBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131204201312.GA39227@anubis.morrow.me.uk> <20131204230155.GA40375@anubis.morrow.me.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Ben Morrow wrote:

> Quoth Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>:
>> On 12/4/2013 12:13 PM, Ben Morrow wrote:
>>> Quoth Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>:
>>>>=20
>>>> The procedure I use is to take the existing ISO and...
>>>>=20
>>>> 1. use mdconfig to access it
>>>> 2. use mount_cd9660 to mount it
>>>> 3. use rsync to copy the contents to a local dir
>>>=20
>>> It's more secure to use tar for these three steps. Filesystems generally
>>> aren't hardened against malicious input.
>>=20
>> I'm curious about this statement.  What extra security would tar get=20
>> you?  Tar would be faster, but I can't think of how it would be more=20
>> secure since it's all going to end up on the same filesystem either way.
>=20
> Tar can extract files from an ISO

Doesn't work in 9.2-R; which is why I still go to mdconfig+rsync.

>From 9.2-R...

$ tar xf ../FreeBSD-10.0-BETA2-i386-20131031-r257419-disc1.iso=20
etc/termcap.small: Can't create 'etc/termcap.small'
etc/unbound: Can't create 'etc/unbound'
sbin/nos-tun: Can't create 'sbin/nos-tun'
usr/bin/make: Can't create 'usr/bin/make'
usr/bin/newgrp: Can't create 'usr/bin/newgrp'
usr/bin/pic: Can't create 'usr/bin/pic'
... ad nauseum ...

Analyzing the situation, for every file that has a symlink *to* it, the
file is not unpacked.  So for the case of all the library files, where
there is a *.so symlink to a *.so.N... the *.so.N is not created, but
the *.so symlink is. So the unpacked data ends up being unusable.

Tried on 10.0 and worked fine. So problem is 9.2-R libarchive.
---=20
Devin

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia=
l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an=
d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma=
nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware=
 that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie=
w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41DA6C6E-1D37-424A-B3EB-6A5CD8ECB022>