Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Gustafson <tjg@soe.ucsc.edu> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fusefs-cryptofs vs fusefs-cryptofs Message-ID: <1832862951.338331277917345049.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu> In-Reply-To: <4C2B747E.3060500@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On FreeBSD, this is spelled GELI (or GBDE, but I think geli is > slightly better). Native filesystem level encryption -- rather > more efficient than something like fuse, needs no extra software > installed, very secure. Sorry, I should have been more specific: This is in the context of a jailed system. So, the encrypted file system must be creatable, configurable, mountable and unmountable entirely from within a jail. Tim Gustafson Baskin School of Engineering UC Santa Cruz tjg@soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1832862951.338331277917345049.JavaMail.root>