Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 17:36:46 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramidi@otenet.gr> To: SJ <sandejain@rocketmail.com> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device driver questions Message-ID: <20010524173645.A13721@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20010523173800.84311.qmail@web13404.mail.yahoo.com>; from sandejain@rocketmail.com on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:38:00AM -0700 References: <20010523085857.B1103@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010523173800.84311.qmail@web13404.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Removed -questions from Cc: - do we have to cross post? ] On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:38:00AM -0700, SJ wrote: > --- Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> wrote: > > > > > 3. File naming question: > > > whats the reasoning behind having "bus.h" and > > > "bus_private.h"....whats the significance of > > > "private" here. > > > > drivers include bus.h, kernel does also include > > bus_private.h > > But still the name "private" confuses me...according > to me it should have been "bus_public.c". Any comments? If its the name that bothers you, then think of it as: . bus.h is a file used by everyone . bus_private.h is a file that is `private' to the kernel --giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010524173645.A13721>