Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:59:41 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Eugene Panchenko <replicator@ngs.ru> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Task activation delays: FreeBSD versus Linux? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202192158080.60489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <web-9970027@intranet.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
define a "task activation delay" and maybe we can discuss it.. it's a rather broad definition. and is that RTlinux? (which is a completly differnt kettle of fish..) On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Eugene Panchenko wrote: > gretings. > > As seen on kerneltrap.org: > --- > Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the ground here with his > 2.2.12 patch which demonstrated that Linux could fairly > easily yield task activation delays which are one to two > orders of magnitude better than any competing operating > system. > --- > > is this a truth ? about "orders of magnitude" ? does FreeBSD > fall under "any competing operating system"? > > thankyou > ____________________________________________________________ > Сделайте себе подарок - http://ngs.ru/tovar > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0202192158080.60489-100000>