Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:      <nik@FreeBSD.org>
To:        seggers@semyam.dinoco.de, nik@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: docs/7791: ipf(1) and ipfstat(1) should have been ipf(8) and ipfstat(8)
Message-ID:  <199904102031.NAA59532@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail 

Synopsis: ipf(1) and ipfstat(1) should have been ipf(8) and ipfstat(8)

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: nik
State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 10 13:30:35 PDT 1999
State-Changed-Why: 
ipfstat has already been moved to ipfstat(8).  ipf(1) remains (and I've
just fixed the bogus ref in the man page to ipfstat(1).  Is this OK, or
do you think ipf(1) should still move to ipf(8)?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904102031.NAA59532>