Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) From: <nik@FreeBSD.org> To: seggers@semyam.dinoco.de, nik@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/7791: ipf(1) and ipfstat(1) should have been ipf(8) and ipfstat(8) Message-ID: <199904102031.NAA59532@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: ipf(1) and ipfstat(1) should have been ipf(8) and ipfstat(8) State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: nik State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 10 13:30:35 PDT 1999 State-Changed-Why: ipfstat has already been moved to ipfstat(8). ipf(1) remains (and I've just fixed the bogus ref in the man page to ipfstat(1). Is this OK, or do you think ipf(1) should still move to ipf(8)? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904102031.NAA59532>