Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:30:51 -0400 From: Chris <rip@overflow.no> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [fbsd] Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD Message-ID: <448A12BB.3040401@overflow.no> In-Reply-To: <p06230932c0afbc6f54dc@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20060526153422.GB25953@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060609095751.GI1273@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <4489DCAE.3070005@overflow.no> <20060609233148.GA88285@gothmog.pc> <p06230932c0afbc6f54dc@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:31 AM +0300 6/10/06, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2006-06-09 16:40, Chris <rip@overflow.no> wrote: >> >> > I'm using it successfuly with the stackp-gap and the random >> > mmap on 6.1-RELEASE. No problems at all really :) Except >> > that I want a nob for gcc to use the protection by default. >> > We discussed this in another email. >> >> You can always use `/etc/make.conf' to set it globally, right? > For the system itself, yes, but as the below text also says: not for customs built programs. > Not quite globally. That will only set it for programs > whose makefiles .include /usr/share/mk/sys.mk . That's > all of buildworld, but it wouldn't include programs that > people are building on their own. > Exactly :) This is however the default on the 4.x and 5.x patches as opposed to the 6.x and 7.x which has slight modified behaviour. I think Jeremie did this to make it as little intrusive as possible, which was a good thought, although I would like the option to make it very intrusive :) -Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?448A12BB.3040401>