Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:48:24 -0400 From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Jon Radel <jon@radel.com> Cc: "Kevin P. Neal" <kpn@neutralgood.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Best free VPN's and how to set them up on 13.0-STABLE Message-ID: <CAGBxaXnYm3R%2Bh6Yt4kdOCwnJTB_kf5AV0XRqVkXbBOCXiDUpmg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1AC3E0F8-A4E0-48A5-AEFD-7FB110A10BDF@radel.com> References: <YXnomwGU7myZp7RQ@neutralgood.org> <1AC3E0F8-A4E0-48A5-AEFD-7FB110A10BDF@radel.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 8:38 PM Jon Radel <jon@radel.com> wrote: > > >> it to be routable from all hosts on my home LAN (the LAN is > 192.168.11.0/24 > > > > Is this a typo? This private network is defined to be 192.168/16, not > /24. > > > > In no way does RFC 1918, or anything else I’ve ever seen, mandate that > that reserved address space be used only as a /16. I rather suspect that > various /24 subnets are by far the most common in the wild, probably led > by 192.168.0.0/24. > Some (cheap) home routers (like mine) only understand /24. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.orghelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXnYm3R%2Bh6Yt4kdOCwnJTB_kf5AV0XRqVkXbBOCXiDUpmg>